Business

Crown alleges Jacob Hoggard is ‘sexual opportunist’ who didn’t take no for an answer


Warning: This story accommodates particulars some readers might discover disturbing. Please learn at your individual discretion.

Jurors had been confronted with two vastly completely different portrayals of Jacob Hoggard on Friday, with prosecutors portray the Canadian musician as a “sexual opportunist” who refused to take no for a solution and defence attorneys describing him as an insecure movie star who used ladies for meaningless however consensual intercourse.

Hoggard, the frontman for the band Hedley, has acknowledged having intercourse with a teenage fan and a younger Ottawa lady within the fall of 2016, leaving jurors to find out whether or not the encounters had been consensual, as he says, or violent rapes, because the complainants allege.

Read extra:

Prosecutors allege Hedley frontman lied about having consensual intercourse with teen, lady

In their closing pitch to the jury Friday, prosecutors stated what occurred in Hoggard’s Toronto-area resort rooms wasn’t what both of the complainants wished, however it was what the singer wished.

Story continues under commercial

“That is not consent,” Crown legal professional Jill Witkin stated.

“Mr. Hoggard acted as an entitled sexual opportunist, someone who sought his own sexual gratification with no regard for (the complainants’) boundaries,” she stated. He was “on a mission to carry through with his sexual preferences in the face of resistance and pain and hurt,” she added.

Hoggard testified he was assured each complainants consented however couldn’t specify how they expressed that consent, saying that he relied on sounds and physique language however offering no particulars on what these had been, Witkin stated.

He additionally stated he had no detailed recollections of the encounters or what specific acts had been concerned, although he acknowledged a few of what the complainants described — akin to spitting, slapping and calling them derogatory names — might have occurred since these had been a part of his sexual repertoire, the prosecutor stated.

Meanwhile, Witkin stated, the occasions described by two complainants — two ladies who’ve by no means met or spoken with one another — shared a lot of similarities past the precise sexual acts they alleged came about.

Both recalled speaking with Hoggard by way of textual content, Snapchat and cellphone calls main as much as the encounters, and receiving a video of him masturbating in a toilet, the prosecutor stated. Both stated he was form and complimentary till the incidents, which led them to belief him, she stated.

Story continues under commercial

Both described a drastic transformation in his behaviour as soon as contained in the resort room, Witkin stated. And each stated Hoggard despatched them messages afterwards “as if nothing had happened,” telling them he had fun and couldn’t wait to see them once more, she stated.

“This is not a coincidence. This is not some unfair twist of fate raging against Mr. Hoggard,” she stated, arguing the ladies’s accounts had been “unusually and strikingly similar.”

Hoggard’s attorneys, nonetheless, informed the jury the musician might have been cavalier and disrespectful in the direction of ladies, however he’s not a “sadistic serial rapist.”

Defence lawyer Megan Savard portrayed her consumer as an insecure, attention-starved rock star who routinely succumbed to the temptation and straightforward validation of one-night stands over greater than a decade of touring with Hedley, even when in a relationship.

But she stated Hoggard didn’t rape the complainants. “He did not take delight in their struggles, he is not a monster, he is a flawed human being,” she stated in her closing submissions.

“His fame and power gave him the capacity to engage in hurtful conduct and two women were hurt by his callous approach to their sexual relationships,” she stated.

“But Mr. Hoggard is not on trial for breaking hearts or disrespecting women, he is not on trial for being cavalier with their feelings. He has already admitted and paid the price for that.”

Story continues under commercial

The proven fact that Hoggard left every complainant alone in an unlocked resort room whereas he showered, and that he took a name and ordered room service in the course of the encounter with the second complainant, is “far more consistent with consensual sex than sadistic rape,” the defence lawyer stated.


Click to play video: 'Hedley singer testifies in his own defence'







Hedley singer testifies in his personal defence


Hedley singer testifies in his personal defence

Savard argued the complainants made up the rape allegations as a result of they had been “upset and embarrassed by the way Mr. Hoggard dismissed them” and the stigma of admitting they regretted a consensual encounter was “too painful.”

She additional steered the complainants “needed a sympathetic story to tell that would allow them to save face” with their shut family and friends, and whereas they by no means initially deliberate to contact police, by 2018, the strain to take action started to mount.

“They’d lived with their lies for so long they had to follow through,” she stated.

Story continues under commercial

Hoggard, 37, has pleaded not responsible to 2 counts of sexual assault inflicting bodily hurt and one in every of sexual interference, a cost that refers back to the sexual touching of somebody beneath 16.

The sexual interference cost pertains to allegations that he groped the youthful complainant backstage after a Hedley present in Toronto when she was nonetheless 15.

The youthful complainant, a longtime Hedley fan who first met Hoggard at age 12, stated they started speaking immediately after chatting at a meet-and-greet occasion in April 2016.

A couple of weeks later, he organized to have her and two pals come to the Toronto present and gave them backstage entry, courtroom has heard. The complainant alleged he repeatedly touched her buttocks whereas taking pictures and later tried to kiss her neck.

The defence argued there was no groping, noting there was no signal of something amiss within the pictures taken that evening.

Prosecutors stated a pal testified she noticed Hoggard attempt to kiss the teenager’s cheek or neck, and the complainant attempt to push him off.

They added a textual content Hoggard despatched the teenager the following day, during which he stated he wished her in his mattress, was an indication he was sexually considering her, and jurors ought to take into account that in assessing whether or not the touching after the live performance was of a sexual nature.

Story continues under commercial

Hoggard testified earlier this week that he didn’t contact the complainant sexually till after she turned 16, including he made a degree to know when she would attain that milestone as a result of it’s the age of consent.

In her submissions, Witkin pointed to Hoggard’s textual content messages with the complainant, during which he referenced ready till she turned 18 then instantly informed her it didn’t matter. “Mr. Hoggard thought 18 was the age of consent at that time and he did not intend to abide by it,” she argued.

The teen agreed to fulfill up Hoggard on Sept. 30, 2016, testifying she believed they’d be procuring or sightseeing. She alleged in her testimony that after in his resort room, Hoggard raped her vaginally and orally and tried to take action anally. She stated she resisted bodily however Hoggard pinned her down.

The second complainant testified she first met the singer on the courting app Tinder and, after being in contact for just a few weeks, agreed to fulfill him in Toronto to have intercourse on Nov. 22, 2016.

But as an alternative of getting consensual intercourse, she was raped anally, vaginally and orally, and at one level dragged by the legs into the toilet, she informed the courtroom.

Both alleged Hoggard spit of their mouths, slapped them and known as them derogatory names. They additionally stated he restricted their respiration: the primary complainant alleged he pushed her face into the pillows till she thought she would go out, and the second complainant stated he choked her so laborious she feared for her life.

Story continues under commercial

The Ottawa lady additionally alleged Hoggard requested her to urinate on him after which stated he would urinate on her, each of which she refused.

Hoggard testified he had consensual, “passionate” intercourse with every of the complainants. While he acknowledged that he couldn’t recall particulars of the encounters, he stated it was his observe to pay shut consideration to his companions’ verbal and non-verbal cues, and that a part of his satisfaction got here from seeing them get pleasure from themselves.

The jury may start its deliberations as early as Tuesday.

© 2022 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.





Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.