Sports

FIA hits back at criticism of F1 Safety Car after Verstappen’s “turtle” remark | F1


Verstappen’s feedback got here after his newest retirement on the Australian Grand Prix, the place he urged F1 to analyze the velocity of the Aston Martin Safety Car.

The Dutchman believes the Mercedes Safety Car – which presently alternates with the Aston Martin equal – is way sooner and thus must be used extra usually.

Speaking after the race, Verstappen mentioned: “The Safety Car was driving so slow, it was like a turtle,” Verstappen mentioned. “Unbelievable. With that car, to drive 140 on the back straight, where there’s not a damaged car anymore, I don’t understand why we have to drive so slow.

“We have to investigate. For sure, the Mercedes Safety Car is faster because of the extra aero, the Aston Martin is really slow. It definitely needs more grip because our tyres were stone cold.

“We went into the last corner, I could see Charles understeering. So I’m like ‘OK, I’ll back off a bit more’ and I had a better line. It’s pretty terrible, the way we’re driving behind the Safety Car at the moment.”

The FIA’s defence 

On Thursday morning, the FIA launched a press release on social media defending the velocity of the Safety Car.

The FIA outlined the aim of the Safety Car and the essential position it has in F1, with outright velocity not being its main objective. 

The assertion learn: “In light of recent comments regarding the pace of the FIA Formula 1 Safety Car, the FIA would like to reiterate that the primary function of the FIA Formula 1 Safety Car is of course not outright speed but the safety of the drivers, marshalls and officials.

“The Safety Car procedures take into account multiple objectives, depending upon the incident in question, including the requirement to ‘bunch up’ the field, negotiate an incident recovery or debris on track in a safe manner and adjust the pace depending on recovery activities that may be ongoing in a different part of the track.

“The speed of the Safety Car is therefore generally dictated by race control, and not limited by the capabilities of the Safety Cars, which are bespoke high-performance vehicles prepared by two of the world’s top manufacturers, equipped to deal with changeable track conditions at all times and driven by a hugely experienced and capable driver and co-driver.

“The impact of the speed of the Safety Car on the performance of the cars following is a secondary consideration, as the impact is equal amongst all competitors who, as is always the case, are responsible for driving in a safe manner at all times according to the conditions of their car and circuit.”

Is the Safety Car too gradual?

Eventual race winner Charles Leclerc practically misplaced the lead of the race at Albert Park after understeering extensive on the ultimate nook as a result of having chilly tyres.

Drivers have usually complained concerning the velocity of the Safety Car, with seven-time F1 champion Lewis Hamilton one who often voiced his frustrations over crew radio when main from the entrance in his title-winning years.

George Russell was fast to defend Mercedes’ Safety Car after the race in Melbourne.

“We don’t have the issue with the Mercedes-AMG Safety Car!

“On a critical be aware, the Mercedes-AMG is like 5 seconds, quite a bit faster, than the Aston Martin security automobile, which is fairly substantial.”



Source hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

close